By Ray Rheault It seems that lately there has been quite a lot of controversy and disagreement about the history of Creation. This rivalry has been growing for years now, in communities (both religious and scientific), in our schools, and even in our courts of law. After such a long, enduring war of beliefs, one must ask the questionare they ever going to find a middle ground? Are these two views of the world so far apart that they can never meet? Perhaps those who argue are simply not willing to let them. In my opinion, based on my own observations, I believe that both of these theories hold an element of truth but are, by themselves, incomplete. I will not say that either belief is wrong, but perhaps that willing lack of bias is the reason that these two seemingly separate perspectives fit so neatly together for me. To be quite honest, I believe the only reason that these two theories have never officially met in the middle is because of their followers blind devotion to being right and someone else being wrong. (See why do we need to limit God?) Im not going to go into great detail about the personal reasons for everyones choice and beliefs; Ive mentioned them in other articles and will probably re-explore them in the future. I will, however, try to start at the beginningliterally. To do this I must make one thing perfectly clear....no matter what it is, a thought or idea, there are always two ways to look at anything. Duality is the basis of perception as much as it is the basis for our belief in how this all started. Knowing this, we must explore both perspectives and their root. Creationism: The belief that all things were created by God, completely, at the Moment of Creation. Evolutionism: The belief that all things were created over time, adapting based on the environment and the rules of survival of the fittest. The key to both of these beliefs is actually in the definition. Creationists believe God is not subject to Time while Evolutionists believe that all things are subject to Time. These are the opposing perspectivesand theyre both based on the concept of Time. Before continuing I would like to take a moment to expand on the concept of Time. I say concept because, as with our beliefs, there are two opposing perspectiveseach one valid, each one a choice. One perspective of Time is that it is Linearmeaning it started sometime (the beginning) and continues in a straight line to some other time (one would assume this means the end). This perspective is based on our observation of cause and effect and, of course, our idea of memory (more on this in future writings). However, there is another perspective of time that is equally valid but rarely examined (except for the occasional spiritualist or Quantum Physicist). This perspective states that Time itself is an illusion, that only the current Moment exists. This perspective is also based on observation but has been unfortunately labelled philosophy. In truth, one cannot prove either one of these perspectives to be true. You cannot prove that 5 minutes ago happened any more than 5 minutes from now will happen. You can try, many people have, but when it comes down to it you are always in the here and now. For example, when you started reading this article it was here and now, but youve moved forward it seems, youve progressed.and yet, youre still here and now. I hope this makes sense because it is vital to the rest of this article. So, the question remains, how can two opposing perspectives meet? Easily if one can admit that they are both true as much as false. The single biggest cause of strife or separation is our need to be correct.this need is based on our own need to feel better about ourselves and, of course, to define ourselves. In fact, without this need, one can see that all perspectives of reality are equally valid. But what do we see? In The Beginning Both the scientific community and the religious community agree on one thing when it comes to creation. They agree that it started somewherewhether you believe in the Big Bang or The Void (Genesis) the beginning is always nothingness. The Big Bang For the most part, scientists believe that all matter, broken down far enough, is the same thingin fact, this thing is not measurable and beyond description. It is so infinitely small that one could actually say it is without size at all. This energy makes up everything, living or otherwise. This energy, in its original form, is the foundation of our material reality. The Big Bang theory is simply an explanation of the steps this energy went through in becoming what we see it to be today. (For a beautifully well designed chart of the Big Bang Process, visit www.crystalinks.com/bigbang.html) Remembering the concept of Time it is easy to see how this theory came into being. One thing must follow another, and another, and so onthus, the Big Bang Theory. This theory still states that the Beginning is indescribablein essence, before there was something, there was nothing. That nothingness evolved and expanded into different variations of itself and, over Time formed the Universe. Makes sense, right? Lets move on. The Void (Genesis) Creation theory is much simpler to explain, and at the same time much more complicated because it delves into the mind of God. To put it plainly, creation theory is the belief that all things were created by God at the Beginning. Genesis states that in the Beginning there was The Void and God was the Void and the Void was God. If youll notice, this theory still believes in that nothingness previously describedthe only difference here is that nothingness had a consciousness. It was Aware. So, nothingness and God are actually the same thingquite literally, everything (remember, first there was only the Void). Now, following this logic, nothingness became reality. Genesis describes this as a Seven Day process, but remember that nothingness has no Time so a Day means absolutely nothing. Keeping this in mind, we see that Genesis is not very different from the above image of the Big Bangit is a list of steps for the creation of the universe. But, does God need Time if it is everything? Further exploration is necessary. Duality and Unity This is going to be the most difficult part of this essay so I ask for your patience and an open-mind. For just a quick moment lets discuss the nature of Reality. After all, whether it is Creationism or Evolutionism the real focus here is the observation of the reality we all experienceright? Right. So, throwing our need to be correct aside, lets actually look at reality without bias or assumption. Reality (the world and our mind) is a complex mixture of equal and opposite perceptions. To put it simply, everything exists in a state of Duality. For Hot you have Cold, Light/Dark, Hard/Soft, Pleasure/Pain, Faith/Fear, etcthis state is constant, without it there would be no experience and no reality. How could you experience Hot if the experience of Cold didnt exist? The tricky part about understanding the Beginning is that this concept does not fall into Duality. What I mean here is that The Void is one thing. This nothingness is still something, but there is only one of it. One thing does not have Dualityit is simple Unity. This is the biggest stumbling block in our understanding of God, Reality, or Creation. We cannot grasp how One Thing (nothing) became so many variations of itselfhow did Duality come into being? There is only one answer to this, and it lies in your existence. One thing cannot be two things, but it can be perceived as two things. Unfortunately, for that to be true there must be a perceiver...thats you. But who was the perceiver in the Void? God and Us Lets assume, for the moment, that this nothingness I have been referring to was actually conscious. Now, as one thing, this consciousness would only be aware of itself. It would not be aware of anything else or the possibility of anything else because it is everythingthere is no space or time, there is simply nothingness and the awareness of its existence as that nothingness. This is Unity. But, to experience anything, Duality must existand so that consciousness had to perceive itself to be two things. For the first time, the Void was perceived (very important) as separate. There was now a Perceiver and a Perceived. Before I continue, I would like to point out something very important about this consciousness. Our understanding of this consciousness is entirely dependent upon our own beliefs and limitations. We are talking about nothingnessinfinitely adaptable (it can be and is the foundation of everything), eternally present (how can something that is everything ever die?), and completely and utterly free (there are no rules to follow). Knowing this, a possibility opens to us. What would you do if you were God? Quite simplyyou would do everything. Everything covers a lot of things, I cannot begin to cover them all, but for the purposes of this exercise let us say that God wanted to experience. The perceiver wanted to perceive every possible variation of itselfwith Eternity to play with, wouldnt you? Remember that this consciousness can never truly die, it has nothing to fear and nothing to loseit is everything and always will be. And so, it has no biasGood or Bad, experience is the only goal. I realize that I keep stating this, but it is really very important to grasp this concept of being everything. Ill use an example just to be clear Currently, you have a countless number of possibilities that can move in and out of your mind. You can imagine purple skies, chocolate cars, and even entire experiences that you are not currently experiencingwe call this imagination, but to a consciousness that is everything there is no such thing as imagination. The mind of God is The Void; therefore any possibility that enters the mind of God is made real because it is within the Void (the building blocks of everything). Think about this, to a mind with no limitation, how many possibilities could exist? An infinite amountquite literally, anything that could exist does exist because all that is real is within the Void (there is nothing else, remember?). Now, doing everything doesnt just imply playing basketball or fishingthese are actions and not complete experiences. A complete experience is not just the action but also the state of mind of the perceiver. This state of mind includes belief, thoughts, doubts, memories, imagination, and even self-imposed limitations. What am I saying? Im saying that God, in wanting to do everything, wanted to experience every possible variation of self-awareness. There are 2 extremes here and an infinite amount of variations in between. < - - Complete Awareness Complete Denial - -> Basically, God not only wanted to experience being everything, it very much wanted to experience what it would be like to not be everything. It wanted to experience what it would be like to be complete unaware of its own divinity. Now, of course, God will always be God (everything cannot stop being everything), but because it perceives itself to be separate from the Void it can absolutely convince itself that it is something else. This is the freedom of an unlimited consciousness...it can believe whatever it likes. The Moment and Time This is the final step in our exploration of Creationism and Evolutionism because this is where they meet. They meet in the concept of Time, remember? First, lets look at The Moment. In The Void (or the Beginning) there is no time. Eternity and a single Moment are the same thing. When Duality was created there was a mass explosion of possible Moments that entered the mind of God (we call this Reality or the Universe). All of these Moments, of course, are still within the Void and therefore exist in the same place or time. Hard to grasp? It should be. Now, remembering that Time does not exist in Unity, we must explore Duality to find it. The perceiver (God convinced it is separate from itself) exists in Duality, and because of that it can experience. But the very concept of experience is based on a series of Moments happening one after anotherso Time must be perceived. The most unbelievable part about this is that, in an infinite amount of possible moments, there is an order to it. There appears to be a story to each of our lives. I mean, with all things existing at once, it is completely possible (to God, all things are) that a Dinosaur could fall out of your fridge at any timebut that doesnt happen, does it? Out of all the seemingly chaotic events in each of our lives there is also an order. Why? Because experience is a broad topicnot only does God want to experience each state of mind, it wants to experience every possible series of experiences as well. Basically, it wanted to be you and everyone else. And here you are, thinking it took you time to read this article, but in reality youve never left the Void. In conclusion, yes the universe was created in steps. Each variation of nothingness expanding into another variation of that same nothingness (see the Big Bang image above), but if God (everything) never left the Void, then those steps are only perceived to be separate from each other when, in fact, they all exist at once. So who is actually correctThe Creationists or the Evolutionists? Both, they are all the same Perceiver wanting to experience a different perception and state of mind. God wanted to experience everything, even disagreeing with itself. Interested in the author or further writings? You should be... forgetfulgod.blogspot.com Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ray_Rheault http://EzineArticles.com/?Creationism-And-Evolutionism:-Two-Perceptions-Of-The-Same-Truth&id=356841 ambien cheap buy
purchase ambien no prescription
ambien lowest price
cheap ambien online
